GMAT Focus Edition · GRE & GMAT Analytical Reasoning
GMAT Data Sufficiency
Judging whether statements provide enough information to answer a question.
Six concepts for GMAT Data Sufficiency — now part of Data Insights. The question is never "what is the answer"; it is whether the statements pin one down. The five choices never change, so the marks come from a testing routine you can run the same way every time.
- GMAT Focus Edition
- Hard level
- 6 concepts
- 5 practice questions
1The five fixed answer choices
Every Data Sufficiency item offers the same five choices. Choice A: statement (1) alone is sufficient, and statement (2) alone is not. Choice B: statement (2) alone is sufficient, and statement (1) alone is not. Choice C: the two statements together are sufficient, but neither alone is. Choice D: each statement alone is sufficient. Choice E: even together the statements are not sufficient.
Memorise the wording cold. On test day you should never re-read the options — the letters alone tell you which sufficiency pattern you have just proved.
Figure. The five letters never change. Memorise the pattern each letter names so you never re-read the options on test day.
| Choice | Statement (1) alone | Statement (2) alone | Together |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | sufficient | not | — |
| B | not | sufficient | — |
| C | not | not | sufficient |
| D | sufficient | sufficient | — |
| E | not | not | not |
Statement (1) alone answers the question; statement (2) alone does not. The choice is
- A
- C
- D
That is the definition of A. C needs both statements and neither alone; D needs each alone. Mixing A with D is the common slip when (2) was never actually tested.
2Sufficiency, not the value
You decide only whether the statements can answer the question — not what the numeric answer is. The moment you know a unique answer is reachable (or that it is not), stop. Computing the final number wastes time the section does not give you, and it is never what the choice asks for.
That is the mindset shift that unlocks the format. A statement that "looks relevant" is not enough; a statement that pins exactly one answer is.
Figure. Data Sufficiency asks whether a unique answer is pinned — not what that number is. Stop the moment uniqueness is decided.
How to stop early
- Name what is askedUnderline the exact question — a value, or a yes/no — so you know what "unique" means here.
- Ask uniqueness, not the numberFor a value question: does this statement force exactly one number? If yes, it is sufficient; write the choice path, do not finish the arithmetic.
- Leave the value blankThe answer sheet wants A–E, never the number you nearly computed.
On a Data Sufficiency item, your job is to
- Compute the numeric answer from the statements
- Decide whether the statements pin down a unique answer
- Find which statement looks more relevant
Sufficiency is a uniqueness test, not a calculation. Relevance without uniqueness is the trap the format is built to catch.
3Evaluate each statement alone first
Test statement (1) alone, then statement (2) alone, and only combine them if neither is sufficient by itself. Never carry information from one statement into the other's individual test — that leak is exactly what turns a correct B into a wrong C, or a correct A into a wrong D.
A practical habit: cover statement (2) while judging (1), then cover (1) while judging (2). Only uncover both when both alone have failed.
Figure. Flowchart for the Data Sufficiency test order. From the question, test statement (1) alone: yes leads to A or D; no leads to testing statement (2) alone. From (2) alone: yes leads to B; no leads to combining both, which chooses C or E.
The testing order
- Statement (1) aloneCover (2). Ask: does (1) by itself pin a unique answer? Record sufficient or not.
- Statement (2) aloneCover (1). Forget everything (1) said. Ask the same uniqueness question of (2) alone.
- Combine only if both failedIf either alone was sufficient, you already know A, B or D. Open both statements together only when each alone was insufficient — then choose C or E.
You may combine the two statements when
- Either statement looks incomplete on its own
- You have confirmed each statement is insufficient alone
- The question asks for a sum or product
Combining is the third test, not the first. Opening both early is how a statement that already answers alone gets misfiled as C.
4Value questions need one number
When the stem asks "what is the value of…", a statement is sufficient only if it forces exactly one number. Infinitely many pairs that satisfy an equation are not enough, even when the equation is true of the unknown.
Read what is asked before you reach for algebra. A statement that gives x - y does not give x + y. A statement written as 2x + 2y = 20 is already x + y = 10 — and that alone may answer the question without its partner.
Figure. Sufficiency depends on the asked target. An open family for (x, y) can still pin a unique value of x + y.
How to test a value stem
- Name the targetWrite the exact expression asked for — x, x + y, |x| — and refuse to compute anything else.
- Simplify each statementRewrite (1) and (2) into the target if you can. Stop the moment the target is a single number.
- Reject open familiesIf two different values still satisfy the statement, it is insufficient — even if both values are "reasonable".
A sum that one statement already gives
What is the value of x + y? (1) x - y = 4. (2) 2x + 2y = 20. Which choice is correct?
- Target askedx + y
- From (1): x − y = 4sum not fixed — (1) alone insufficient
- From (2): 2x + 2y = 20x + y = 10
- Does (2) alone answer the stem?yes — unique value 10 → B
Pro tip. Check whether a single statement already yields exactly what is asked before assuming you must combine. Here (2) is the sum in disguise; combining with (1) would still give 10, and would wrongly look like C if you never tested (2) alone.
What is x + y? (1) x - y = 4. (2) 2x + 2y = 20. The answer is
- A
- B
- C
(1) alone leaves the sum free. (2) alone rewrites as x + y = 10, so (2) alone is sufficient and (1) is not — that is B. Choosing C means you combined without testing (2) alone.
5Yes/no questions need one consistent answer
For a yes/no Data Sufficiency stem, a statement is sufficient if it always gives the same answer — always yes, or always no. Consistency is sufficiency; positivity is not. A statement that sometimes yields yes and sometimes no is insufficient, even when "yes" is the answer you expected.
Even powers hide sign: x^2 = 9 gives x = 3 or x = -3, so "is x > 0?" is not settled. Odd powers keep sign: x^3 = 27 gives only x = 3, and the yes is locked.
Figure. Number line for statement (1) of the worked example. Tick marks at x = −3, 0 and x = 3. Under x squared equals 9 both −3 and 3 are allowed, so the yes/no question "is x greater than 0" gets no at −3 and yes at 3 — not a unique answer. Positions are to scale on a span from −4 to 4.
How to test a yes/no stem
- Try for both answersUnder the statement alone, hunt for one case that says yes and one that says no. If both exist, the statement is insufficient.
- Watch even powersAn even power of x (or an absolute value) usually admits two signs — check both before calling the statement sufficient.
- Accept a consistent noIf every allowed case answers no, the statement is sufficient. "No" is a definite answer, not a failure.
Even power fails; odd power settles
Is x > 0? (1) x^2 = 9. (2) x^3 = 27. Which statements suffice?
- From (1): x² = 9x = 3 or x = −3
- Is x > 0 under (1)?yes for 3, no for −3 — not unique
- From (2): x³ = 27x = 3
- Is x > 0 under (2)?yes — sufficient alone → B
Pro tip. Even powers hide sign (two real roots); odd powers keep sign (one real root). That single distinction decides a large share of yes/no sufficiency items.
Is x > 0? (1) x^2 = 9. (2) x^3 = 27. The answer is
- A
- B
- C
(1) allows x = 3 (yes) and x = -3 (no), so it is insufficient. (2) forces x = 3, a consistent yes, so (2) alone is sufficient — B. Choosing C would mean treating the sign ambiguity in (1) as if both statements were needed to clear it.
6Combine only after both alone fail
Choice C is the most common wrong letter when the testing order is skipped. You open both statements, solve, get a clean number, and pick C — without noticing that one of the two statements already forced that number alone.
The rule is mechanical: never combine until each alone has been marked insufficient. If either alone works, the letter is A, B or D. Combining is reserved for the residual case where each alone leaves the answer open and the pair closes it — or fails to, which is E.
Figure. Combine only when both alone marks are insufficient (I/I). If either alone is sufficient, the letter is A, B, or D — not C.
How to avoid a wrong C
- Mark each alone firstWrite S or I beside (1) and beside (2) before you let the two statements touch.
- Read the pair of marksS/I → A. I/S → B. S/S → D. Only I/I opens the combine step.
- Combine as a third testWith both open, ask uniqueness again. One value → C; still open → E.
You solved using both statements and got a unique value, but you never tested (2) alone. The risk is
- Choosing E when the answer is C
- Choosing C when the answer is B
- Choosing A when the answer is D
If (2) alone already pinned the value, the correct letter is B. Combining first manufactures a C that looks earned and is wrong. The worked example on "value questions need one number" is exactly this trap: 2x + 2y = 20 alone gives the sum.
Notes
- Fixed Answer Choices: The five DS options are always the same (statement 1 alone, 2 alone, both together, either alone, or neither), so memorize them.
- Sufficiency Not Value: You decide only whether the statements can answer the question, not what the numeric answer is.
- Evaluate Separately First: Test statement (1) alone, then (2) alone, and only combine them if neither is sufficient by itself.
- Yes/No Questions: For yes/no DS, a statement is sufficient if it always gives the same answer (always yes or always no), even if that answer is 'no'.
Formulas
- Choice A: (1) alone sufficient, (2) alone not.
- Choice B: (2) alone sufficient, (1) alone not.
- Choice C: both together sufficient, neither alone.
- Choice D: each alone sufficient. Choice E: even together not sufficient.
Exam traps & shortcuts
- Never combine the two statements until you have confirmed each is insufficient alone, or you risk a wrong C.
- For yes/no questions, look for a statement that pins the answer to a single consistent response; consistency, not positivity, is sufficiency.
- Avoid computing the actual value—stop as soon as you know a unique answer is (or isn't) reachable.
Reference tables
One page for the night before. The five letters never change; the two sufficiency tests do — unique value against consistent yes/no.
| Stem type | Sufficient means | Insufficient means |
|---|---|---|
| What is the value of…? | Exactly one number | Two or more possible values |
| Is … ? (yes/no) | Always yes, or always no | Yes in some cases, no in others |
| Test order | (1) alone → (2) alone → both | Opening both first |
Recap
Six pegs. Run them in order on every Data Sufficiency item.
- Five letters
- A = (1) only, B = (2) only, C = both needed, D = each alone, E = even both fail. Memorise; never re-read.
- Judge, don't solve
- Stop when uniqueness is decided. The sheet wants A–E, not the number.
- Alone first
- Cover (2) while testing (1); cover (1) while testing (2). Combine only on I/I.
- Value stems
- Sufficient means exactly one number. Rewrite the statement into what was asked before you combine.
- Yes/no stems
- Sufficient means a consistent yes or a consistent no. Even powers hide sign; odd powers keep it.
- Wrong C
- A clean answer from both statements is still B (or A) if one statement alone already forced it.
Practise GMAT Data Sufficiency
Reading is free and needs no account. Practice, mocks and progress live in the app.
- 5 exam-style questions on this topic, with explanations
- A 5-question practice set that ends the chapter
- Timed mocks scored with the real marking scheme
- Readiness tracked per topic, kept on your device